Thursday, 22 December 2016

Bizarre defence of new iPads by Wrexham Council leader

In response to Wrexham Council leader Mark Pritchard's bizarre attack today on Plaid Cymru (see below), Marc Jones, who chairs Plaid Cymru in Wrexham, said: 

"Cllr Pritchard should do his homework before launching such an ill-informed tirade. I have no doubt this bizarre outburst is as a result of being challenged by members of the public who are fed up with councillors closing vital services but feathering their own nests.
As to his specific points: 
- Does he not understand that councillors can access e-mails and papers via Webmail on their PCs or their own tablets?
- Does he not realise that the council already installs the Good App on personal tablets that allows councillors to access the council intranet securely?
- Does he not realise that any Plaid councillors elected in May could opt to buy a council iPad out of their own pockets, to save the taxpayer £32,000? 
Perhaps the council leader will show the lead in this respect, especially as councillors now receive £100,000 extra between them each year compared to 2012. 
At a time when the council pleads poverty and says it has to close day care for the elderly, youth services, leisure centres and libraries, to say that councillors must have free top-of-the-range iPads is a scandal. 
The 'dark age' Wrexham faces is largely due to this current council being completely out of touch with the people. It has failed to deal with key questions affecting the county borough. Plaid Cymru's candidates will continue to offer a clear alternative to that failed council leadership in order to create a better Wrexham."

THIS IS THE PRESS RELEASE THE COUNCIL PUT OUT TODAY ATTACKING PLAID CYMRU 
Leader Hits Back over iPad decision

Wrexham Council's Leader has hit back at Plaid Cymru Wrexham who say they will not accept a new iPad if elected to office in next year's local council elections.

Cllr Mark Pritchard said such a decision lacks insight into the needs of a modern, effective elected official who will be expected to represent thousands of constituents during their five year term of office.

"How on earth do these Plaid Cymru prospective councillors expect to conduct their business confidentially, securely and efficiently if elected? Using their own equipment is fraught with problems of security and confidentiality and what happens at the end of the five years?

"The iPads have worked very well for current councillors and have helped us save at least £110k in the printing, posting, landfill waste  etc., of the many reports and documents received by councillors. They allow quick access to emails and reports and all councillors having the same iPad gives consistency for our ICT department who are only dealing with one device compared to several different operating platforms.

“The current iPads are at the end of their service life, are no longer supported by the service provider and require replacing

“The use of iPads is now common amongst councils and Wrexham and Wales is no different in providing its elected members with the correct equipment to do the job they are elected to do and to respond to our constituents quicker. It seems Plaid Cymru want to go backwards into the dark ages which I find rather strange given that the two Plaid councillors on Wrexham council both have iPads, hypocrisy comes to mind.”


Friday, 16 December 2016

Call to "re-think" failure to investigate Dee Valley Water takeover bid


The decision of the Competition and Markets’ Authority not to conduct an in-depth investigation into the proposed takeover of Dee Valley Water by Severn Trent is “a matter of deep regret” according to Plaid Cymru North Wales AM Llyr Gruffydd.

Mr Gruffydd said: “Prior to the Water Act 2014, a Phase 2 investigation into such a takeover in the water industry would have been compulsory and it’s a matter of deep regret that the goalposts have been moved by the UK Government on this matter.

“This proposed takeover of Dee Valley Water will cost jobs, hit local suppliers and damage the economy of north-east Wales. It will also mean the end of a 150-year-old company that leads the industry in terms of its customer care and quality.

“A successful takeover would also raise broader questions about control of the Welsh water industry and whether water services in Wales are best run from here or from Coventry. I’m in no doubt that this is a crucial natural resource for Wales as well as an important local employer that needs safeguarding. That’s why I’ve been supportive of the staff’s concerns from day one and want to see the company retain its independence.


“The CMA should re-think its decision in the light of proposals to devolve more power over water to the Welsh Government from 2018. No decision should be permitted without taking that into consideration and that means a thorough investigation.”

Thursday, 15 December 2016

Plaid AM calls for detailed investigation of Dee Valley Water takeover bid

This is the copy of a letter from Llyr Gruffydd, Plaid Cymru's North Wales AM, and others have sent to the Competition and Market Authority calling for a detailed investigation into the proposed takeover of Dee Valley Water. As the penultimate paragraph emphasises, there is far more at stake here than just one company. The entire future of water services in Wales hangs in the balance:

"Dee Valley Water feel strongly that the takeover by Severn Trent Water should be referred to the Stage 2 Competition and Market Authority review process.

Dee Valley Water is the smallest company in the sector and provides an important performance benchmark for what a small, but relatively high performing company can achieve.  It delivers a high level of customer service and performance and has a proud and well-respected history of supporting its customers.  By being local it is better able to understand the needs of customers and can deliver these services quickly, efficiently and effectively.  It is the best performers in the industry for billing customer service and leakage.  If the merger is allowed to proceed then Ofwat’s ability to regulate and set targets will be impaired by the loss of a top industry performer in these areas.

The water industry is going through a series of significant changes with the introduction of competition to various elements of service, new indexation of debt, separation of price controls and the potential for significant policy divergence between England and Wales.  All previous water company mergers and acquisitions have had a Stage 2 review carried out and this was a mandatory requirement until November 2015.  It would seem that not carrying out the same process at a time of greater regulatory uncertainty could negatively affect Ofwat’s statutory duty at a critical time when the industry is starting the PR19 process.

Dee Valley Water has the fourth-lowest water bills within the industry (substantially cheaper than Severn Trent Water by 19%), is industry leading for customer service, its local direct labour force and suppliers deliver low-cost infrastructure schemes in comparison to the rest of the industry.  For example, its unit rates for carrying out mains replacement work are considered to be very low and contribute to lower bills for customers.  Dee Valley Water is concerned that Severn Trent would not be able to match these low costs.  The loss of a high-performance business that is small enough to quickly respond to the changing regulatory environment could hinder Ofwat’s ability to regulate, compare and incentivise performance.

As a small business it is able to innovate.  DVW has a long history of supporting its customers before the introduction of social tariffs in the industry.  It was the first company to offer free meter installations back in 1996, four years before being made compulsory for the rest of the water industry.  It was also the first company to offer a weekly direct debit collection to sit alongside their bespoke personalised and extended payment plans.  These bespoke plans support over 11% of its customer base.  It also carries out home visits to customers, and by using its partnerships with other support services helps to ensure their customers receive the best outcomes to suit their circumstances.  It has also pioneered the use of ice-pigging as an efficient method for cleaning mains pipelines.

Dee Valley Water’s importance as a comparator is even more significant for Wales.  It provides a useful comparison of small company performance against that of Dwr Cymru/Welsh Water.  Following the proposed takeover, there would only be Dwr Cymru/Welsh Water operating mainly in Wales and the Welsh Government would therefore lose an important comparator as Severn Trent’s performance will be dominated by its English operation.  Even with a separate Welsh licence, the customer service performance and relative efficiency comparators will be lost for Wales as these services will be provided from England and will not be separable. The lack of this truly Welsh comparison could be more important over time as devolution continues.

The transfer of any type of power or responsibility for water in Wales is a hugely emotive subject.  The people of North Wales in particular have not forgotten their lack of voice over the flooding of Tryweryn in the 1960s.  Carwyn Jones, the Welsh First Minister, has also stated publicly in the Senedd that “I would not support any changes that would result in the loss of Welsh jobs.  The CMA have launched an investigation into the deal …. we will be looking to provide comments”. Given that all previous water company acquisitions have had a stage two review and the public opinion in North Wales regarding Welsh ownership of its own water asset, it would seem wholly inappropriate to appear to be fast-tracking this process with just a stage one review.


In summary, Dee Valley Water provides a unique comparator for the other companies due to its size and performance on billing, customer service and leakage.  The loss of challenging performance targets for other companies could harm overall customer service for the industry.  The fact that it is one of only two Welsh water companies would result in Wales losing a useful performance benchmark for its one remaining company.  Furthermore, the people and elected officials of Wales must be a part of this process to ensure that the outcome of the proposed merger does not negatively impact on the future well-being of the people living in Wales."

Tuesday, 13 December 2016

Make Wrexham ‘finance capital of Wales’ with new bank and revenue hub

Plaid Cymru AM's call for greater devolution to the North

The new Development Bank of Wales should be headquartered in Wrexham to develop the town as the ‘finance capital of Wales’, according to Plaid Cymru’s North Wales AM Llyr Gruffydd.

Mr Gruffydd made his call after the Welsh Government announced the new institution would be based in north Wales. Plaid Cymru had pushed for the new bank, which would provide support and funding for new and small businesses, as part of the £119m compact it agreed with the Welsh Government after the May elections. The Development Bank was one of Plaid Cymru’s nine key election pledges.

Mr Gruffydd said: 
“I’m delighted this new bank will be located in the North and Wrexham would be an ideal base for the bank. Wrexham should also be the home of the new Welsh Revenue Authority, which will collect taxes on behalf of the Welsh Government.
 "We have long argued that devolution of power should mean that key institutions are based throughout Wales and this is a step in the right direction. Together, the Development Bank for Wales and the Welsh Revenue Authority would create the basis of making Wrexham the finance capital of Wales.”

The Development Bank’s priority is to help small and medium businesses in Wales to access finance more easily and specifically to address funding that new and micro enterprises can struggle to access.

Mr Gruffydd added: 
“There are skilled financial sector staff in Wrexham already and plenty of suitable office space. The decision by the HMRC to move its tax offices from Wrexham to Bootle in the coming years offers both experienced staff and potential office space to develop the town as the finance capital of Wales.

"I very much hope the minister will take careful consideration of Wrexham as a location when he makes his final decision next year and that Wrexham Council can work to make this a reality.”

• The 350 workers currently employed at HMRC's Wrexham are due to be re-located to Bootle or made redundant by 2020-1 as part of the UK Government's centralisation of tax services.



People power saves Plas Madoc



A leading Plaid Cymru activist has praised people power for saving Plas Madoc Leisure Centre after it was given a £50,000 lifeline in a remarkable u-turn today by Wrexham Council.

The council's executive board had been expected to refuse the funding, as was recommended by council officers, on the basis that cooperative running Plas Madoc Leisure Centre was losing money.

However, in his presentation, the lead member for leisure services Hugh Jones conceded that the community-run trust had performed exceptionally in its first two years to turn a £550,000 deficit (when the centre was run by the council) into one in the tens of thousands.

The £50,000 grant - which appeared as if by magic from a pot of money held in reserve - will help the Trust meet its running costs and comes on the back of a £500,000 Welsh Government grant to make essential repairs to outdated equipment.

Marc Jones, who fought to keep Plas Madoc open back in 2014 and was at today's meeting with other campaigners, said:
"It was quite a dramatic turnaround, to say the least, and wrong-footed most of the councillors present.
 "Of course it's wonderful news and will provide all the hard-working volunteers and staff at Plas Madoc with security for the future. On top of that, it means work on essential maintenance and improving the centre can take place.
 "There's no doubt that there are weaknesses in the way the Trust is operating and that will hopefully be addressed in the coming weeks and months, but the main thing is that it will remain open for the foreseeable future.
 "Cynics will say that the coming council elections helped focus executive board members' minds but I prefer to think of it as people power winning the day."

Monday, 12 December 2016

Campaigners present petition to save Wrexham's fire engine

Campaigners fighting to save one of Wrexham's two fire engines have presented a petition with thousands of names.

Plaid Cymru activists have spent the past two months collecting signatures in the town centre and by knocking doors as part of their campaign to save one of Wrexham's two fire engines, which is under threat from proposals by the North Wales Fire and Rescue Service.

The consultation into the plan, which would also mean axing 24 full-time firefighters' posts, came to an end on Monday, December 12, and the campaign will now have to wait until March when the Fire Authority makes its final decision.

Marc Jones, who has coordinated the campaign to save the fire engine in Wrexham, said: 
"Plaid Cymru members have been knocking doors each week for the past two months to collect signatures and have had a great response on the doorstep.

"We've also had the support from FBU members and other trade unionists in the town centre stalls we've organised. I'm also incredibly grateful to the staff at the Wrexham library cafe for their work in collecting hundreds of names."

Mr Jones said the campaign had succeeded in making the issue a talking point in the town: 
"This started back in May when a neighbour who's a firefighter came by to discuss the situation. It was clear back then that a major campaign was needed to make people aware of the real threat to cut one of the two whole-time fire engines in the town.

"Our march on November 5th was a testimony to that strength of feeling - after that I felt people in authority started to take us seriously.

"The support from the Fire Brigades Union was crucial and the local press have picked up on the matter and given solid support. I'm also pleased that the local council as well as Flintshire councillors, AMs and MPs have expressed their opposition to the cut.

"The petition has collected more than 3,000 names and we're grateful to everyone who signed. I'm particularly thankful to the Plaid Cymru members who've gone out in the wind and the rain to collect these signatures and raise awareness street by street."


He said the Fire Authority now had to realise that axing the service was not an option: 
"Public opinion is clearly against this and the facts speak for themselves. Wrexham takes a quarter of all the calls in north Wales, it deals with 43% of all arsons and has a growing population. On top of that it will have a huge new prison on its doorstep from next May and that will increase the pressure on our hard-pressed fire services.

"I've spoken to people who have survived fires thanks to our firefighters and I very much hope that Fire Authority members will be listening before making their final decision in March."

• Pictured: Plaid Cymru activists with their petition outside the new Wrexham Fire and Ambulance Station, opened earlier this year at a cost of £15m. Nice shiny building but no money for a fire engine!

Thursday, 8 December 2016

Plaid Cymru plan to keep Plas Madoc Leisure Centre open


Plaid Cymru has urged Wrexham Council to keep Plas Madoc Leisure Centre open with a £50,000 grant. If not, it has proposed a series of concrete proposals to ensure the popular leisure centre stays open.

Marc Jones, spokesperson for Plaid Cymru in Wrexham, said:
"Allowing Plas Madoc Leisure Centre, which attracted 400,000 in the past year, to close for a second time would be nothing short of criminal. The council's recommendation to refuse any funding package is on the basis that the leisure centre isn't making a profit.

"I'm sure the council realises how difficult it is for any leisure centre to make money given that it was losing £450,000 on the very same centre only two years ago. Plas Madoc provides an important service to the community, it improves the health and well-being of many and would be hugely missed by all of those who've grown up with it.
"So we're calling on Wrexham Council's executive board to provide the £50,000 funding for this year conditional on the Community Trust sorting out its financial shortcomings, which have been a problem.
"Plaid Cymru is making it clear that its councillors, if elected in May, will continue to support Plas Madoc as an important community asset for the whole borough."
Plaid Cymru's regional AM Llyr Gruffydd has also written today to Welsh Government cabinet secretary Carl Sargeant to ask whether the £500,000 grant he announced in October was conditional on Wrexham Council providing the funding. He has also asked the Welsh Government whether part of the grant could be used for revenue funding, i.e. to pay for immediate running costs.

Mr Jones stated:
 "If the Welsh Government has £500,000 available for essential repairs and maintenance, then it should consider utilising a fraction of that cash for essential running costs. Otherwise the £500,000 will not be utilised and the leisure centre will be closed."
Mr Jones also added: 
"If neither Wrexham Council or the Welsh Government will fund running costs for the coming few months, then it's down to the community again. I've written to the Splash Community Trust to ask that they launch a Crowdfunder scheme and also to approach community councils throughout the borough for a one-off donation or loan to maintain the centre for the next six months.
"Nobody wants to lose Plas Madoc as a community facility so the decision on Tuesday is critical. The council would be getting a good deal for its £50,000. It's a drop in the ocean for an organisation with a £200 million budget. To put it into perspective, the mayor costs £138,000 a year and the annual bill for councillors is £930,000. I really hope the executive board makes the right decision on Tuesday.
"These are our suggestions to keep it open and I hope one of them works for the sake of the staff, volunteers and everyone who uses Plas Madoc Leisure Centre."

Wednesday, 7 December 2016

Plas Madoc: A drop in the ocean could save our leisure centre

Let's see a tidal wave of protest against this council

Wrexham's Labour-run council used to lose £450,000 a year on Plas Madoc Leisure Centre so, back in March 2014, they voted to close it.

This was in the face of a huge local campaign to save this popular service. As a result, the local community came together and eventually re-opened it as a cooperative on a shoestring in December 2014.

The cooperative is now asking for £50,000 a year from the same council to keep it going. Sounds like a good deal for the council you'd think... the same service at a fraction of the price.

And remember that this is a council that spends:

• £2.1m on consultants who tell them how to save money (I'm not making this up)
• £1.6m on new paving and lighting for King Street, where the disruption led to many shops closing
• £138,000 each year on the mayor
• £100,000 each year in extra payments to councillors
• £31,000 on replacing councillors' old iPads

That gives you an idea of how £50,000 is just a drop in the ocean for a council with a £200m annual budget.

Yet they are willing to risk closing a much-loved leisure centre that attracts 400,000 each year and plays an important part in promoting health and well-being in the county.

After months of delay, a final decision will be made at the council's Executive Board on 13th December. If the Executive Board fails to provide funding for Plas Madoc, it will close in January. Jobs will be lost, leisure services will be lost... all for the cost of keeping a mayor.

A refusal to fund the leisure centre will also mean a £500,000 grant from the Welsh Government to make essential repairs and maintenance will be lost. Again, only an idiot would turn their backs on such funding for such a small outlay. But it seems we are being run by a committee of idiots.

One final thought: Labour politicians have been vocal in their condemnation of the council's refusal to fund Plas Madoc Leisure Centre. These same politicians were silent when their fellow Labour councillors were voting to close the centre. The excuse then was "we've got to make cuts, we've got no options". The excuses are still the same now - so what's changed? Apart from the fact that half the Labour group has jumped ship and become independent... Nothing has changed.

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Council shafts People's Market traders in u-turn

Plaid Cymru says: Stop wrecking Wrexham

Despite repeated assurances by this failing Wrexham Council, the People’s Market will close while construction takes place on converting the building into an Arts and Cultural Hub. It's a spectacular and embarrassing U-turn on previous assurances to traders and the public that work and trade would take place simultaneously.

Isobel Garner, Project Manager for the ‘regeneration of the People’s Market/Oriel Wrecsam’ (aka the Arts Hub conversion) was asked the direct question as to whether the People’s Market is closing after a lively discussion in the Town Centre Forum meeting this evening.

Ms Garner clarified that the frontage shops outside, car park and the ‘corridor’ areas would remain open, but the market hall would be closed for work with no traders remaining.

This completely contradicts previous promises that building work would continue alongside trading.
Any food and his dog knew that this was unrealistic to say the least and it has caused huge concerns among the traders.

Marc Jones, speaking for Plaid Cymru locally, said: 
"I know of at least one trader that won't be returning to the People's Market because of the disruption and uncertainty. Let's hope there aren't more.
 "This council is wrecking Wrexham - whether it's our markets, our historic buildings, our green fields that they want to concrete over or important public services like Plas Madoc. At every turn, this Tory/Independent coalition is wrecking our area and people should remember that when they turn out to vote next May in the council elections." 

‘Don’t repeat shambles on the buses’ plea as company licence revoked


Llyr Gruffydd, Plaid Cymru’s North Wales AM, has appealed to the Welsh Government and Wrexham Council to avoid a similar shambles on the buses.

The challenge comes after two companies operating buses in the Wrexham area – including the 146 service from Whitchurch via Penley to Wrexham – had their licence revoked by the Traffic Commissioner.

Mr Gruffydd made his plea to the Welsh Government minister in the Senedd this afternoon.
He said:
  “The decision yesterday to revoke the licences would not have been a surprise given the history surrounding GHA Coaches. That could have been foreseen. Therefore I’d like to know what steps the Government, together with Wrexham Council, is taking to ensure that bus users don’t suffer a repeat of the shambles we saw over the summer. Bus users have been told the service will end on December 19 and that a replacement services will be tendered for – this can take weeks or even months. 
 "What will be done to ensure there are temporary services in place to ensure passengers can get to work, to college, to school and visit hospitals and other appointments? Will the Welsh Government work with the council to ensure that?”

Mr Gruffydd also questioned how new routes were allocated to directors who had been running the failed GHA Coaches: 
“The council has questions to answer in terms of due diligence – surely there are background checks done on companies and directors tendering for work? All this uncertainty could have been avoided if those checks had been done.”

 It emerges that the new contract will not begin until April 1st 2017, leaving passengers potentially stranded for another three months.

UPDATE: Wrexham Council have acted decisively in this case and found bus operators to continue to run RJ's of Wem services from the 19th December with no break in the service. This is the case for all routes apart from the number 6 from Ruabon to Wrexham. Credit where it's due - the council has listened and appears to have learned from the problems of the summer.


Sunday, 4 December 2016

Dee Valley: Only a pawn in their game?


The hostile takeover bid of Dee Valley Water by Severn Trent will cost jobs and hurt the wider local economy. That much is clear.

But to what extent is Dee Valley Water just a pawn in a far bigger game? Plaid Wrecsam has already highlighted Severn Trent's longer-term intentions, which are now becoming clearer.

ST is proposing to combine its water resource zone in Powys with the Wrexham water resource zone, to create its ‘Welsh’ business.

However, the company's Powys region is believed to be one of its most expensive areas to serve and that it uses cross subsidies to enable those costs to be spread across ST's whole supply area, thereby keeping bills consistent across all its customers. 

But, if ST took over DVW over and brought its Powys region under a distinctive Welsh licence, these costs would be spread across a much smaller customer base and there is therefore the potential for bills to rise, not only in Powys but across Dee Valley Water’s current Welsh customer base. 

Staff at Dee Valley are asking: "Has any consideration been given to this matter and has Severn Trent been challenged on this?"

It is clear that there is no immediate financial benefit from paying such a high premium for DVW.

The growing suspicion, therefore, is that this is a politically motivated move.

We have learned that ST's bosses came to talk with DVW staff a couple of weeks ago. The chief executive Liv Garfield said that buying Dee Valley Water would give ST a ‘place at the table’ in relation to Welsh Government policy. 

A strange use of words because ST already has a place on the Welsh Government’s Wales Water Forum, although it hasn’t been as engaged in the process as DVW and Welsh Water of course.

The Wales Act is likely to transfer more power over water to the Welsh Government, something the Government of Wales Act of 2006 under Peter Hain's guidance significantly omitted.

The concern of many is that ST is using Dee Valley Water as a pawn to gain more influence over the Welsh Government, to safeguard its very favourable current arrangements (see below) in relation to Welsh water resources and potentially seek to exploit these further for use across the border in England. 

This is something Plaid Cymru MPs have long highlighted.

Following the publication of Water UK’s report on long-term resilience in the water industry, Ofwat has started to encourage water companies to consider some of the possible solutions highlighted in this report. One of those identified for ST was the possibility of moving water via the Dee, into its area – buying DVW would obviously make it easier to do this. 

This looks like Part 2 of Severn Trent's theft of water in Wales - please read on for the first part of that theft.

Severn Trent's water robbery of Wales (Part 1)


In 1984 the Thatcher government imposed a contract upon Welsh Water compelling it to sell water to Severn Trent Water Authority (both were then in public ownership). This was an acknowledgement that Wales had a right to expect payment for water it exports to England. However the terms of contract were outrageously favourable to Severn Trent and can only be described as a steal.
 The contract states that Welsh Water must supply Severn Trent with up to 360 million litres (80 million gallons) of water daily for cost price (see below for the terms written into the privatisation of Severn Trent Water in 1990). 
 It is alleged but unconfirmed that the cost is 3 pence PER TONNE (the equivalent of 73 GALLONS FOR 1 PENNY) 
 This contract runs until March 31 2073 but the contract also has a written-in clause for a renewal option for another 99 years. This daylight robbery plunder must be re-negotiated to ensure that Welsh water is able to charge a fair rate for its water. 

Dwr Cymru 
Agreements for the import of water from the Elan Valley Reservoirs provide for Dwr Cymru to supply water from the Elan Valley Reservoirs to Severn Trent Water for 99 years (with an option for Severn Trent Water to renew the supply agreement prior to 31st March, 2073), at an annual charge which varies from year to year by reference to the average of the water supply unit costs of the two companies. The amount of water supplied shall, save in certain circumstances, be as required by Severn Trent Water, but shall not exceed approximately 360 Ml/d. 
 Dwr Cymru are responsible for, and bear the cost of, maintaining, operating and renewing the reservoirs and the abstraction of water. The supply agreement can be renegotiated at an earlier date in certain circumstances, with provision for the terms of the new arrangement to be determined by third parties in the absence of agreement. The agreements also provide for the sale by Dwr Cymru to Severn Trent Water of the Elan Valley aqueduct and connected land and buildings including the treatment plant (the "Elan Valley Assets") at a consideration of £31.7 million. 
 Completion of the sale is deferred until the earlier of 31st March, 2073 and the expiration of 21 years after the death of the last survivor of the issue of the late King George V (whether children or more remote) actually born before the date of his death. 
The consideration is held by trustees upon terms which entitle Dwr Cymru to the income and, in certain circumstances, portions of the capital. During the term of the contract of sale, Severn Trent Water is entitled as licensee to possession and control of the Elan Valley Assets and the benefit of any income from them.
 Severn Trent Water is also obliged to operate and maintain them and meet all costs and liabilities relating thereto.
 Dwr Cymru is entitled for a consideration to take water from the aqueduct to supply certain areas in its own Water Region. If the contract of sale is completed, Dwr Cymru will become entitled to the trust fund absolutely. If the supply agreement becomes subject to renegotiation (including in circumstances where Severn Trent Water gives notice that it intends to renew the agreement for a further 99 years) the contract of sale lapses, save for certain specified provisions in the contract which continue while negotiations are carried out. 
 These provisions include the right of Severn Trent Water to possession and control of the Elan Valley Assets, the right and benefit of any income therefrom, and the obligations of Severn Trent Water to operate and maintain those assets and meet all costs and liabilities relating thereto. As with the supply agreement, the terms of the new contract for sale may be imposed by a third party if Severn Trent Water and Dwr Cymru cannot reach agreement with respect to the arrangements for the use, occupation or ownership of the Elan Valley Assets. During the period that the contract of sale is being so renegotiated, the trustees hold the trust fund for Severn Trent Water absolutely.